Opinion / Liang Hongfu
SOE reform will hurt if workers are not flexible
By Liang Hongfu (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-01-10 07:30
In a recent talk show hosted by CCTV, a group of top mainland executives
and government regulators were invited to express their views on one of
the most pressing business issues in China State-owned enterprise
restructuring. The speakers quickly zeroed in what they unanimously
considered to be the crux of the problem, which was the lack of checks
and balances at the top.
As many economists and management experts have been saying for a long
time, this particular problem arises from the common practice of
appointing the most senior executives of a State-owned enterprise to be
members of the board of directors. As a result, the chief executive of a
State-owned enterprise is usually chairman of the board. In such a
position, he or she can rule the enterprise with little accountability.
For that reason, the reform of State-owned enterprise has set its focus
on changes at the top, calling for, among other things, the
re-constitution of the boards of directors. In some cases, the
enterprises are instructed to recruit their chairmen from outside the
organization.
Much was said on the show about the role and responsibilities of the
chairman of a typical privately owned company. The emphasis is on vision
and accountability to shareholders.
The effectiveness of the restructuring of an enterprise is being measured
by profit attributable to shareholders, return on shareholders' funds,
return on sales and cash flow. These criteria were purportedly
established to ascertain the efficiency in the use of capital by a
particular enterprise. As one speaker said, the efficient use of capital
is what really matters in any restructuring.
But a change at the top, no matter how thorough, does not necessarily
guarantee an improvement in the bottom line. In a typical corporate
restructuring, many painful and, at times, protracted steps will have to
be taken to achieve the established goals.
And therein lies the rub. The case-study files of many business school
students are filled with stories of successful corporate rescues mounted
by company doctors more adapt at wielding a hatchet than a scalpel. In
any one of these typical restructurings, unprofitable businesses were
dumped, inefficient plants closed and non-productive assets sold in rapid
succession to stop the erosion of value and profit.
This process would invariably lead to wave after wave of layoffs as the
company struggled to control its fixed costs. The social cost in such a
corporate restructuring in China could be magnified by the lack of a
comprehensive social security net that could provide temporary relief to
the newly unemployed.
To be sure, corporate restructuring can also create new jobs for people
with the appropriate skill set. But many more workers who are either
unable or unwilling to acquire those skills will stand to lose their jobs.
In the pursuit of corporate restructuring, it must be recognized that
some hard decisions leading to painful adjustments must be made. A new
board of directors and, perhaps, a fresh management team will have to be
allowed to make such decisions as they see fit to rescue the enterprise
from certain failure. Indeed, some of these enterprises would have
already gone bankrupted if it had not been for the constant infusion of
fresh capital from the State.
To avoid layoffs, or to ensure that they can find alternate employment
quickly, workers will have to broaden their knowledge and upgrade their
skills to meet the demands of the fast changing business world. In Hong
Kong, for example, the wholesale relocation of the manufacturing industry
to the Pearl River Delta region in the 1980s had resulted in the loss of
almost all manufacturing jobs. But Hong Kong people adapted to the change
as the fast growing services sector rapidly absorbed most of the laid-off
workers.
The mainland economy and social structure are, of course, infinitely more
complex than that of Hong Kong. But the underlying principle of
adjustment and adaptation to rapidly changing market conditions is not
entirely dissimilar. The will and capability of the managers and workers
of many mainland State-owned enterprises should not be in doubt because
it is clear that they recognize the need for reform.
Email: jamesleung@chinadaily.com.cn
(China Daily 01/10/2006 page4)
Hot Talks
� President's List of Do's and Don'ts for China
� How important is 'Face' (Mian Zi) to everyone?
� The Woeful Health of the Nation
� China, USA should be natural allies
� Beijing's leverage over Taiwan
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
No comments:
Post a Comment